Supreme Court takes a correct step to fight terrorism‏

اضيف الخبر في يوم الخميس ٠١ - يوليو - ٢٠١٠ ١٢:٠٠ صباحاً.

 

www.tawfikhamid.com  

 

  

The supreme court upheld the government's authority Monday to ban aid to designated terrorist groups, even if such support may be intended to direct groups toward peaceful and legal activities (1). Once the State Department places a group on the list, it is illegal for Americans or others in the country to provide ''material support or resources'' to the group. The law also bars travel to the U.S. by representatives or by members of the group and freezes any assets that the organization has in U.S. jurisdictions.

The justices voted 6-3 to reject a free-speech challenge from humanitarian aid groups to the law that bars ''material support'' -- everything from money to technical know-how to legal advice -- to foreign terrorist organizations.

Human rights organizations say the law's ban on providing training and advice to nearly four dozen organizations on a State Department list squanders a chance to persuade people to renounce extremism.

Chief Justice John Roberts said in his opinion for the court that material support intended even for benign purposes can help a terrorist group in other ways.

I add my voice to the decision of the Supreme Court, as meeting with terrorist groups and giving them any form of support (even humanitarian) can have several negative consequences. These include the following:

1-    Terrorist groups who have a humanitarian wing can do different forms of money laundering to use the money given to them under the banner of a humanitarian 'aid' to ultimately support their terrorism agenda

2-   More humanitarian support for terrorist groups decreases the pressure on them to spend part of their own money to support the humanitarian needs of their own societies. This actually allows such groups to have more available money to spend on their violent activities.

3-   Giving humanitarian aid to these groups can help them improve their image among their local population and thus allow them to get more votes in democratic elections. For example, giving support to Hamas in the form of a humanitarian aid can help them to win in the next election against the PLO. To the contrary, depriving these groups from such an aid can help turn their society against them for failure to provide the basic needs of the population. The latter approach can also send a clear and strong message to the societies that choose terrorists to represent them (such as the Palestinians who choose Hamas in their last election), that violence and barbarism will not solve their problems.  

4-   Giving aid or support to Islamist terrorist groups under the banner of humanitarian purposes can be perceived by the jihadists as sign of weakness by the US. The jihadists can interpret this humanitarian American hand as a failure of its anti-terrorism and military measures and thus may aggravate the desire of the radical groups to further attack the "weak" US at the military front.

5-   Giving the terrorist the advantage of getting humanitarian support for their local population is a form of acknowledging the legitimacy of these groups. This can make such terrorist groups more reluctant to accept the decisions of the international community as they simply get what they want in the form of aid and some element of recognition without accepting the international laws.

Depriving the terrorists from all forms of support including the humanitarian one is crucial to defeat terrorism. Any form of support or recognition given to these groups can be counterproductive and can actually give more fuel to the radicals to continue using violence. This is like giving a humanitarian aid to the Nazi regime in Germany during WWII. It can only help this regime to continue fighting.

The above decision of the Supreme Court is certainly a correct one to help the US defeat terrorism. The next step that needs to be addressed by both the Executive and Legislative branches is the formal definition of "material support" to include ideological support in the phenomenon of terrorism. Persons, organizations, and governments that promote publishing or promoting material that undervalue the lives of non-Muslims and dehumanize them must be held accountable for giving material support for terrorism, as these texts help terrorists to lure young Muslims and recruit more people to their groups. For example, best-selling mainstream Islamic books that are written by leading Muslim scholars and mainstream Islamic institutes and mosques promote the idea that the lives of non-Muslims have less value than that of Muslims (2). Also, they promote the idea that fighting and killing non-Muslims to subjugate them to Islam is a religious duty (3) and that dying as a martyr in violent Jihad is the greatest deed for a Muslim person (4). This form of teaching to young Muslims is probably one of the -or the- most important support factor for the terrorists, as it guarantees a continuous breeding ground for jihadists and suicide bombings. A decision by the Supreme Court to consider the promotion of such an ideology and value system that disrespects human life as a material support for the terrorist groups is desperately needed.

 

1-    http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1103531271607&s=246&e=001mVFhyePvq9HRdcryRvwxCFVSgjIls8uuEoOtu1X5GeuNDAP2veqsUNm0_lu_ov5MnXbOlFJJFJkmmP9NmAT8O_ROYd4vf4j0LtGigNYKNlaOOgM9MXbTQS8Z_rZLUv4A6YO4aBkPKFZJFUCwLOM3S6r5hnY8JvpxXRbeaGWvsLI=  

2-   Fiqh: According to the Quran & Sunna by Muhammad Subhi bin Hasan Hallaq Vol 2 Page494-495

 

3-   Minhaj Al-Muslim by Al-Jaza'iry first editin Vol  2 Page 529

 4- Fiqh Al-Sunna by Saiid Sabeq (Arabic) Vol 3 Pages 27-29

 
اجمالي القراءات 3151
أضف تعليق
لا بد من تسجيل الدخول اولا قبل التعليق

تقرير نيويورك تايمز يدق ناقوس الخطر: هل تذوب جبال الهيم

الاندماج النووي سباق أمريكي صيني على طاقة قد تعيد تشكي

لماذا عادت جنوب أفريقيا لملاحقة إسرائيل أمام محكمة الع

دوغ فورد.. من هو "كابتن كندا" متصدّر المواجهة مع ترمب؟

إثيوبيا تفتح جبهة جديدة مع مصر: ادفعوا ثمن مياه النيل

طلبات برلمانية لتجريم الإساءة إلى الرموز الدينية في ال

أطفال الناجيات من الاغتصاب في مصر ضحايا القوانين.. ابنة

أطفال الناجيات من الاغتصاب في مصر ضحايا القوانين.. ابنة

12 مليار دولار باسم حافظ الأسد.. مذكرات خدام تفتح خزنة أس

من أستاذ فيزياء وعميد كلية علوم إلى بائع خضار.. قصة «الع

more
اخبار متعلقة

Supreme Court takes a correct step to fight terrorism‏

Supreme Committee for Elections Hands Decision over to Ministry of Interior to Correct Sadat’s Rep

Terrorism Out of Saudi Arabia

Dr. Tawfik Hamid to Speak on "Passive Terrorism"‏

Sadat Calls on President for Fair Elections‏

فيديو مختار
شارك اهل القران
عن موقع اهل القران
منهج موقع اهل القران
شروط النشر بالموقع
اشترك بالنشرة الاكترونية

دعوة للتبرع

اضغط هنا للتبرع بشيك
مقالات من الارشيف
أحمد الجَحَاوى أحمد الجَحَاوى

أعضاء جسم الإنسان فى القرآن

عمر أبو رصاع عمر أبو رصاع

رداً على مقال التواتر لشريف هادي

رضا البطاوى البطاوى رضا البطاوى البطاوى

قراءة فى رسالة فتيا في حكم السفر إلى بلاد الشرك

سامح عسكر سامح عسكر

انتفاضة الشباب في معرض القاهرة الدولي للكتاب

شادي طلعت شادي طلعت

الجزاء .. قصة قصيرة

عمر أبو رصاع عمر أبو رصاع

الازمة المالية العالمية - ابعاد و آفاق

هاني الدمشقي هاني الدمشقي

الدعوة إلى الله

رضا عبد الرحمن على رضا عبد الرحمن على

الشعب المصري هو المستفيد ..تعليقا على .. مقال الأستاذ مح

آحمد صبحي منصور آحمد صبحي منصور

ومن الجهل ...ماقتل .!!

شادي طلعت شادي طلعت

مواطن قوة أمريكا 8- القضاء الأمريكي

آحمد صبحي منصور آحمد صبحي منصور

ق 3 ف 3 : انواع المنكرات الخارجية التي اخذتها اللجنة علي

آحمد صبحي منصور آحمد صبحي منصور

مساجلات مع جريدة الوفد عام 1989 : ( 2 )

محمد على الفقيه محمد على الفقيه

قانوني الهلاك والتجديد أزليان

فوزى فراج فوزى فراج

رسالة ((هامة)) الى جميع الكتاب والمعلقون على الموقع

محمد منصور محمد منصور

وأفلس كثير من الأطباء

more
فاسألوا اهل الذكر

ثلاثة أسئلة: الس ؤال الأول : اليهو د اليوم لا يقولو ن ...

الاستطاعة فى الحج: أنا ست كبيرة ، وأملى أحج . ومش مستطي عة لأنى ما...

ثلاثة أسئلة: ثلاث ة أسئلة متراب طة : السؤ ال الأول :...

سؤالان : السؤا ل الأول : فى رأيك من سيفوز فى...

حالة الاضطرار: لنفتر ض اننى اعمل فى مكتب للزوا ج المدن ى فى...

more