Are Men more superior to Women in the eyes of God

Part 2

Hypothesis:

Chapter 4: 34, Chapter Al Nesa’, according to the following description, is clearly discriminatory with respect to inherent mental superiority of men over women, with men being more worthy of dominance over women and their leading role in the family, and that it requires women to submit to and take orders from their husbands.

" ط§ظ„ط±ظ‘ظگط¬ظژط§ظ„ظڈ ظ‚ظژظˆظ‘ظژط§ظ…ظڈظˆظ†ظژ ط¹ظژظ„ظژظ‰ ط§ظ„ظ†ظ‘ظگط³ظژط§ط،ظگ ط¨ظگظ…ظژط§ ظپظژط¶ظ‘ظژظ„ظژ ط§ظ„ظ„ظ‡ظڈ ط¨ظژط¹ظ’ط¶ظژظ‡ظڈظ…ظ’ ط¹ظژظ„ظژظ‰ ط¨ظژط¹ظ’ط¶ظچ ظˆظژط¨ظگظ…ظژط§ ط£ظژظ†ظ’ظپظژظ‚ظڈظˆط§ ظ…ظگظ†ظ’ ط£ظژظ…ظ’ظˆظژط§ظ„ظگظ‡ظگظ…ظ’ ظپظژط§ظ„طµظ‘ظژط§ظ„ظگط­ظژط§طھظڈ ظ‚ظژط§ظ†ظگطھظژط§طھظŒ ط­ظژط§ظپظگط¸ظژط§طھظŒ ظ„ظگظ„ظ’ط؛ظژظٹظ’ط¨ظگ ط¨ظگظ…ظژط§ ط­ظژظپظگط¸ظژ ط§ظ„ظ„ظ‡ظڈ ظˆظژط§ظ„ظ„ظ‘ظژط§طھظگظٹ طھظژط®ظژط§ظپظڈظˆظ†ظژ ظ†ظڈط´ظڈظˆط²ظژظ‡ظڈظ†ظ‘ظژ ظپظژط¹ظگط¸ظڈظˆظ‡ظڈظ†ظ‘ظژ ظˆظژط§ظ‡ظ’ط¬ظڈط±ظڈظˆظ‡ظڈظ†ظ‘ظژ ظپظگظٹ ط§ظ„ظ’ظ…ظژط¶ظژط§ط¬ظگط¹ظگ ظˆظژط§ط¶ظ’ط±ظگط¨ظڈظˆظ‡ظڈظ†ظ‘ظژ ظپظژط¥ظگظ†ظ’ ط£ظژط·ظژط¹ظ’ظ†ظژظƒظڈظ…ظ’ ظپظژظ„ظژط§ طھظژط¨ظ’ط؛ظڈظˆط§ ط¹ظژظ„ظژظٹظ’ظ‡ظگظ†ظ‘ظژ ط³ظژط¨ظگظٹظ„ظ‹ط§ ط¥ظگظ†ظ‘ظژ ط§ظ„ظ„ظ‡ظژ ظƒظژط§ظ†ظژ ط¹ظژظ„ظگظٹظ‘ظ‹ط§ ظƒظژط¨ظگظٹط±ظ‹ط§ " (ط³ظˆط±ط© ط§ظ„ظ†ط³ط§ط، 34),

4:34 “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, with[the bounties] God has given to some more than others and with what they spend out of their own money. Righteous wives are devout and guard what God would have them guard in their husbands’ absence. If you fear high-handednessfrom your wives, remind them [of the teachings of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you have no right to act against them: God is most high and great.”

First, in the above verse there is not the slightest mention of mental or inherent superiority of men over women, rather, the only reference is to men being “  " ظ‚ظژظˆظ‘ظژط§ظ…(protector and maintainer) as a matter of fact not to a divine decree, and “  " ظ‚ظژظˆظ‘ظژط§ظ…means also, the one who is there for the benefit of and at the service of women , not one who is against them.

The verb " ظ‚ظژظˆظ‘ظژط§ظ…"in the above verse, which is an indication of the subsistence, and real natural circumstances, is due to two reasons:

1- Some of the gender inequalities of the male sex (to make a generalization) are important in being a defender or guardian, e.g., muscular superiority, far –sighted planning, and being less prone to emotional feelings.

2- Being responsible for providing for family expenditures and managing joint family assets.

Clearly in any society the responsibility of management and guardianship are placed foremost on the shoulders of the person who is more capable and has the talent for this responsibility (not for all roles and responsibilities) and one who has made the monetary investment for such responsibility. With respect to family, the heavy responsibility of providing for family expenses is assigned to the man of family due to superior physical strength and experience in family provisions. Since any family service and responsibility should be reciprocated in turn, the woman's cooperation in accepting the man as being the custodian of such responsibility is required.

Unfortunately, many women and men operate under the premise that this guardianship, i.e., supervision, means superiority and that it is a privilege which God has bestowed upon men and that is why the male sex is the preferred sex. In fact, the Qur'an in tens of verses recognizes the superiority and excellence to be attributes of self-control and does not recognize inherent or sexual superiority.

If in keeping watch and being “ ) " ظ‚ظژظˆظ‘ظژط§ظ…protector and maintainer)for the family men naturally have superiority over women, in many cases women too have obvious advantages over men which are compatible with their natural responsibilities in life.

The other point is that the subject verse 4:34 is indicative of the way of life of the human societies at the time of the Qur'anic revelations. Clearly, as the societal roles of men and women change, i.e., women in the west nowadays partake in the army, police force, and other hard labors, the basis of the laws governing the role of women in the society will also change and the reasons once valid for such roles will become obsolete.

In such cases one needs to seek the answer to the question as to whether this overhaul in the reassignment of family responsibilities based on physical and natural abilities ultimately has resulted in favor of women, or has added more responsibilities on their already weak shoulders and has weakened the foundations of the family as the man pillar of society?